| |
 |
| |
E.Abadi,
Consultant Economist |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
In the past 60 years or so
the Iranian population has
changed remarkably: at one
stage the population was very
young but now it seems to be
ageing.
The census taken of the Iranian
population in 1956 revealed the
size of the population to be 19
millions. By 2001 this population
had expanded to 64.5 millions
as officially announced by the
country’s authorities though
many experts put the figure at
the 70m level, because, they
claim, a few million Iraqis and
Afghanis live in the country
unofficially, their number not
being included in the census.
Even if we go by official figures,
the population has increased
by almost 3.5 times in 44 years,
which is indeed alarming. What
was even more alarming till a
few years ago, however, was
the post-Revolution maximum
rate of 3.9% population growth
that prevailed for a number of
years. The major expansion in
population took place after the
Islamic Revolution of Iran when
the number increased from 30m
or so in 1979 to almost 70m in
2001 with the result that in the
1990s the Iranian nation became
very young with almost 65% of
the people below the age of 25.
At this time the government
suddenly realized that it had
failed to implement proper
family regulation programs and
attempted to do so then, but
without success. During all these
years the rate of inflation was
also high which meant that the
cost of living was rising and the standard of living declining. As
younger people became adults
and found that they could not
afford to have families and make
homes because of inflation and
the high costs, population growth
declined to the present level of
1.4-1.7%.
| Table 1 - Population (1966-2001) |
| Year |
Population growth rate (%) |
Age |
| |
|
Mean |
Median |
| 1966 |
3.1 |
22.2 |
16.9 |
| 1976 |
2.7 |
22.4 |
17.4 |
| 1986 |
3.9 |
21.7 |
17.0 |
| 1991 |
2.5 |
22.1 |
17.6 |
| 1996 |
1.5 |
24.0 |
19.4 |
| 2001 |
1.7 |
26.2 |
21.8 |
The Ministry of Health and
Medical Education claims
the decline to be one of its
achievements and gives the
lower figure of 1.4%. The
Management and Planning
Organization seems to be more
reasonable and gives the higher
figure of 1.7%. Whichever the
correct figure, the decline is not
the government’s doing, but
poverty’s!
Today, however, while many
people may be relieved that the
population boom is over, some
experts are concerned about the
decline because, they fear, a too
low level of growth means the
ageing of the population and the
loss of an important comparative
advantage of the country:
young, educated, able human
resources.
The low population growth has
had significant consequences. At
one time the Iranian government
had to build many schools
across the country at all levels
and to employ teachers. But now
that the population is ageing,
i.e. the number of boys and
girls below 15 is diminishing
(from 46% of the population in
1986 to 32% in 2001), many
classes are becoming empty and
many teachers idle, particularly
at the primary level, and this
redundancy will certainly spread
to higher levels as well in the
future (Table 2).
Migration to cities
Since 1956, when 31% of the
population lived and worked in
urban and 69% in rural areas,
the rural population has been
increasingly migrating to the
cities and towns, especially the
larger cities, and mainly the
provincial capitals.
| Table 2 - Population (1966-2001) |
| Age group |
Year (%) |
| |
1966 |
1976 |
1986 |
1996 |
2001 |
| Below 15 |
46 |
44.5 |
45.0 |
39.5 |
32.2 |
| From 15 to 46 |
50.1 |
52.0 |
51.0 |
56.1 |
63.0 |
| 65 and above |
3.9 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.4 |
4.8 |
| Total population |
25,789,000 |
33,709,000 |
49,450,000 |
60,055,000 |
64,907,000 |
Better hospitals, schools and
living conditions in general,
which can be found in these
cities, and especially the
availability of more jobs,
attract many from villages to
the cities. Today, 65% of the
population lives in towns and
only 35% in villages, although
the actual number of the rural
population has remained the
same as a result of population growth during the past years.
Thus there is no concern in
the villages where there is still
surplus population for whom
there is no work and who move
to towns, but in these towns,
there is havoc: buildings have
to be erected to house the
incoming people, schools have
to be set up, means of public
transportation must be provided,
increasingly heavier traffic is
seen everywhere, air pollution,
shortage of treated water… Meanwhile, many villages have
grown in size and population
to become towns such that the
number of towns in the country
has risen from 496 in 1986 to
885 by the end of 2000, i.e. 389
villages have turned into towns
in 14 years. This means serious
damage to the environment.
Iran’s most serious problems at
the moment are in the areas of
housing, health care, education,
and employment especially for
the young people. Meeting the
demands in these areas requires
heavier and heavier investments
to be made.
Another serious problem the
country faces is the issue of
brain-drain, as many of the
high quality and highly qualified
young Iranians migrate to
other countries, mostly to
Canada with a much smaller
percentage to Australia, New
Zealand… Even so the rate of
unemployment has been rising
among the youth such that
today out of the total number of
unemployed, i.e. 14.2% of the
total population, young men and
women who have just arrived
in the labor market make up
2%. There is therefore great
room for investment in Iran in
the science-intensive economic
and industrial entities which can
attract many young engineers,
physicians, physicists, chemists
etc, etc. Such industries as
communications, electronics,
information, engineering and
technical services… would be
very profitable in Iran and the
government is intent to offer
help and incentives to foreign
investors. So, welcome foreign
investors!  |